They Promised Hundreds of Communities a Long-Overdue Lifeline, and Then Once Again Failed to Deliver.

Written by Jillian Blanchard, L4GG’s Senior Vice President, Climate Change and Environmental Justice 


I still remember talking with Benton Harbor community residents about how their families were forced to buy their daily drinking and cooking water from the local grocery stores because the water in their community was unsafe to drink. But the crisis wasn’t just the lead pipes - it was the indifference. Removing the lead pipes in their community wasn’t a high enough priority for decision makers at city hall, the state legislature, or Congress. 

This isn’t an outlier.

Whether it is the legacy of redlining that funnels pollution into specific ZIP codes or a waste facility placed exactly where a lifesaving community resource center should be, these outcomes are the historical footprints of exclusion and neglect. In America, proximity to harm and exposure to toxic pollution has never been a coincidence of geography; it is a design choice made by those who view frontline communities as disposable. 

So, when I sat down to write this Earth Day message, I wanted it to be honest. And the honest truth is this: justice is not a preference. It is an enforceable right - one that many communities have yet to be granted.

A Promise Written Into Law

In 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act, which included a federally mandated investment in the communities bearing the heaviest pollution burdens. Under Clean Air Act Section 138, lawmakers appropriated $3 billion as a direct congressional mandate to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to fund community-driven critical public health projects that had long been ignored. 

The Community Change Grants and Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grants flowed from that mandate. These funds were awarded to tribal nations, rural counties, cities, and communities where residents had been asking for basic environmental protections for generations. These grants did not unlawfully prioritize one community over another, they were based on real, actionable science, sending money for the first time to the places that had the lowest air and water quality and had long been neglected. Critical grants were made to fund stormwater drainage studies and repair, air quality monitors in communities with high asthma rates in children, emergency shelters in hurricane zones, clean energy resilience upgrades, and lead service line replacement, etc. According to a 2024 economic study by Allstate, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, every $1 invested on climate resilience and preparedness saves communities $13 in damages, cleanup costs, and economic impact. That’s a big return on human investment. These weren’t wasteful programs; they were overdue ones. 

What Happened and Why It Was Unlawful

In early 2025, the EPA did the unthinkable. In a single day, a Trump political appointee recommended terminating the entire portfolio of environmental justice grants. The stated reason? Environmental justice was no longer an agency “priority.” Hundreds of organizations received boilerplate termination letters, funds were frozen without warning, staff were laid off, and programs that were years in the making, were shuttered overnight. 

This wasn’t a budget shortfall. This was an administration declaring that the communities Congress specifically funded EPA to protect were no longer worth protecting. 

When the government signs a grant agreement, it creates a binding obligation. When it breaks the agreement without cause, it violates the law. And if an administration can unilaterally withhold billions in funding that Congress explicitly mandated for critical health projects, the rule of law and the Constitution become mere suggestions - and every community’s safety becomes contingent on who holds the pen. That’s not how the rule of law works.
— Jillian Blanchard, L4GG’s Senior Vice President, Climate Change and Environmental Justice

What We’re Doing About It

At Lawyers for Good Government, we aren’t just documenting this crisis; we are arming grantees with legal support and litigating it in court. 

Through our Federal Fund Protection Initiative, we have mobilized a large-scale legal infrastructure in coordination with our partners at the Environmental Protection Network, providing bi-weekly updates, resources, and legal and technical assistance to grantees with unlawfully terminated grants. Our pro bono Court of Federal Claims Clinic provides direct representations to affected organizations - because our work here is about more than just recovering funds. It’s about holding the line, protecting communities, and protecting the rule of law. It’s about whether Congress’s spending authority means anything at all.

What This Looks Like In Communities

For the past year, we’ve provided legal support and advocacy on behalf of over 600+ environmental justice grant recipients across the nation. The impact of these unlawful acts isn’t abstract. It has names and ZIP codes.

In Houston, Air Alliance was prepared to launch a pollution-permit notification system that would have warned Gulf Coast residents before industrial emissions reached their lungs. The grant was unlawfully terminated without warning.

In Richmond, California, an area that is home to the Chevron refinery and well known for its battle fighting for clean air, a $19 million grant that would have funded a resilience center, planted trees, restored Wildcat Creek, and electrified 40 local homes, was canceled. 

In areas like Hartford and Bridgeport in Connecticut, where storms are getting stronger and floods recur, communities are asking hard questions about fossil fuels driving the damage, and insurance industries that decide not just who is covered, but who is left behind.  

This Earth Day, we’ve worked with three grantees to share their stories in their own words:

  1. This Earth Day, Houston’s air quality is getting dirtier

  2. Richmond’s Hidden Toxics: This Earth Day, Look Out Below

  3. To Save the Planet, We Must Change the System

Why This Moment Demands Your Action

We’ve spent the past decade fighting in courtrooms, in Congress, and alongside communities who have been forced to fight for the most basic protections, and while this moment is not news, the scale is, and it will take all of us to fight back. 

This Earth Day, we’re marking this Administration’s failure to deliver on the promise of protecting American lives and our very basic human right to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and exist on a livable planet. Join us in helping to deliver on this promise anyway, in the absence of federal leadership.

Because the child I think about - the one whose family had to save its weekly earnings to buy bottled water to cook food safely - deserves better.  Help us fight for their future

Why Reproductive Justice and Trans Liberation Are One Fight

 Why Reproductive Justice and Trans Liberation Are One Fight

Bodily autonomy, the fundamental right to make decisions about one’s own body without coercion or harm, and health equity, the principle that everyone is able to attain their full potential for health and wellbeing, depend on freedom from state violence. State violence refers to the use of force, intimidation, and oppression by a government against citizens and noncitizens alike, and is deeply entangled with white supremacy, policing, and criminalization. These systems are fundamentally incompatible with the tenets of bodily autonomy and health equity, as they function as root causes of health disparities by undermining community health—heightening psychological distress, worsening pregnancy outcomes, and restricting access to medical care.

The Dust Gets Everywhere: A Lawyer's Account from Inside a Texas Detention Center

The Dust Gets Everywhere: A Lawyer's Account from Inside a Texas Detention Center

L4GG Litigation Director Amy Powell traveled to El Paso as a lawyer. She came back with dust in her hair, dirt in her lungs, and a clearer sense of what justice actually requires. Here, she shares a first-hand account of what she witnessed inside one of the country's largest immigration detention facilities — and why more attorneys are urgently needed.

Texas’ Attack on a Latina Midwife Extends a Legacy of Racialized Policing of Care

Texas’ Attack on a Latina Midwife Extends a Legacy of Racialized Policing of Care

Bodily autonomy, the fundamental right to make decisions about one’s own body without coercion or harm, and health equity, the principle that everyone is able to attain their full potential for health and wellbeing, depend on freedom from state violence. State violence refers to the use of force, intimidation, and oppression by a government against citizens and noncitizens alike, and is deeply entangled with white supremacy, policing, and criminalization. These systems are fundamentally incompatible with the tenets of bodily autonomy and health equity, as they function as root causes of health disparities by undermining community health—heightening psychological distress, worsening pregnancy outcomes, and restricting access to medical care.

There Is No Bodily Autonomy Without Defunding ICE

There Is No Bodily Autonomy Without Defunding ICE

Bodily autonomy, the fundamental right to make decisions about one’s own body without coercion or harm, and health equity, the principle that everyone is able to attain their full potential for health and wellbeing, depend on freedom from state violence. State violence refers to the use of force, intimidation, and oppression by a government against citizens and noncitizens alike, and is deeply entangled with white supremacy, policing, and criminalization. These systems are fundamentally incompatible with the tenets of bodily autonomy and health equity, as they function as root causes of health disparities by undermining community health—heightening psychological distress, worsening pregnancy outcomes, and restricting access to medical care.

The hybris of power in Minnesota and why the legal response can no longer wait.

The hybris of power in Minnesota and why the legal response can no longer wait.

Over the past several weeks, Minnesota has become an unsettling mirror of something deeper than a series of federal enforcement operations. Numerous videos have circulated on social media documenting hostile interactions between agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and members of the public: officers confronting people who are filming them, issuing verbal threats, or attempting to seize their phones by force.

Do Human Rights Extend to Transgender Americans?

Do Human Rights Extend to Transgender Americans?

As our Civil Rights and Health Equity Project Fellow Allison Chapman explains below, transgender, nonbinary, and intersex Americans are the latest group of people to be excised from our nation’s framework of protections. Freedom of movement is a foundational human right, protected under Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As we close out this year’s International Human Rights Day, please be sure to read Allison’s urgent piece on how that right is being curtailed  for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex people and share our fact sheet on the current status of rapidly-changing federal policy surrounding our necessary travel documents.

How Attorneys Can Help Combat Pregnancy Criminalization

How Attorneys Can Help Combat Pregnancy Criminalization

A South Carolina bill that would have created one of the nation’s most extreme abortion bans has failed to advance in the state Senate. If passed, the bill would have outlawed nearly all abortion care, removed exceptions for rape, incest, and fatal fetal anomalies, and imposed prison sentences of up to 30 years on anyone who obtains or assists with an abortion, including the pregnant person. Although abortion-rights advocates rightfully celebrated the blocking of SB 323, legal scholars point out that pregnant people in the state already face scrutiny and even criminalization for pregnancy loss, despite the fact that abortion itself is not formally criminalized.

The Fight for Body Autonomy is the Fight for Democracy

The Fight for Body Autonomy is the Fight for Democracy

Since beginning his second presidential term, Donald Trump has made restricting healthcare access and civil rights a defining feature of his administration.  Research shows that authoritarians often manufacture and weaponize moral panics around gender and sexuality to weaken democratic institutions. By targeting marginalized groups, they erode the civil rights protections that safeguard all citizens and consolidate political power. Controlling people’s bodies becomes a means of controlling populations, suppressing dissent, and maintaining social and political dominance. Through this lens we can determine that the Trump administration’s efforts to limit reproductive rights and LGBTQ equality are not isolated policy choices but part of a broader authoritarian playbook. 

Mifepristone Under Attack

Mifepristone Under Attack

The Trump administration is considering restricting access to mifepristone, a medication used in nearly two-thirds of abortions in the United States and widely prescribed for miscarriage management. pproved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 25 years ago, mifepristone has consistently been shown to be safe and effective. Although the FDA originally imposed burdensome Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) restrictions on the medication, it eased these requirements over time in response to extensive research supporting the drug’s safety.

Starve, Wait, or Go Back: The Cruelty Behind the Attack on Asylum Work Permits

Starve, Wait, or Go Back: The Cruelty Behind the Attack on Asylum Work Permits

The Trump administration is preparing a new rule that would block asylum seekers from obtaining work permits while their cases are pending. If enacted, this change would eliminate one of the only remaining lifelines in the U.S. asylum system. For over 30 years, asylum seekers have been able to apply for work permits after a certain waiting period. This proposal would undo that—turning survival into a privilege, and waiting into a punishment.

A blog post by Estuardo Cifuentes, Project Corazon Program Manager

Project Corazón’s Estuardo Cifuentes: The Human Cost of Reimplementing MPP

Project Corazón’s Estuardo Cifuentes: The Human Cost of Reimplementing MPP

Estuardo Cifuentes, Project Corazón Manager, speaks on the devastating impact of the reimplementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP). As a survivor of the program, Cifuentes sheds light on how MPP exposes migrants to violence, denies due process, and violates fundamental human rights, calling for urgent action to end this inhumane policy.