L4GG Official Statements

More than 2,600 Lawyers and Legal Professionals From All 50 States Sign Open Letter Demanding Senate Reject Todd Blanche as Attorney General

More than 2,600 Lawyers and Legal Professionals From All 50 States Sign Open Letter Demanding Senate Reject Todd Blanche as Attorney General

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG) today delivered an open letter to the United States Senate signed by 2,631 American lawyers and legal professionals from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, calling on every senator to oppose the confirmation of Todd Blanche as Attorney General of the United States.

L4GG Condemns Trump's $1.776B IRS Settlement and Tax Shield as 'Brazen Abuse of Presidential Power'

 L4GG Condemns Trump's $1.776B IRS Settlement and Tax Shield as 'Brazen Abuse of Presidential Power'

Read L4GG’s official statement in response to President Donald Trump settling his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS in exchange for a $1.776 billion fund to compensate those who claim they were targets of government "weaponization," and new reporting that the IRS will also be barred from pursuing tax claims against Trump.

L4GG Condemns Partisan Disenfranchisement at all Levels of Government — But Especially In Our Nation’s Highest Court

L4GG Condemns Partisan Disenfranchisement at all Levels of Government — But Especially In Our Nation’s Highest Court

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court took the extraordinary step of immediately certifying its decision in Louisiana v. Callais, bypassing its own standard 32 day delay. In doing so, it gave Louisiana Republicans the green light to immediately redraw their congressional maps, hurting minority voters and upturning the regularity of our electoral system after votes have already been cast. The result: two majority-Black districts, drawn to give their residents fair shot at representation, are now at imminent risk of elimination after last week’s decision all but erased Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

L4GG Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief Defending Independence of Federal Worker Appeals Board

Today, Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG) filed an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court in Harris v. Bessent, urging the Court to uphold long-standing limits on presidential removal power and protect the independence of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), the agency responsible for adjudicating federal employee appeals.

The case centers on whether the President can remove MSPB members at will, an action L4GG argues would undermine due process protections for federal workers and erode the constitutional requirement of impartial adjudication.

L4GG filed the brief alongside amici Professors Nick Bednar, the McKnight Land-Grant Professor at the University of Minnesota Law School; Victoria Nourse, the Ralph V. Whitworth Professor in Law at Georgetown University Law Center; and Lawyers Defending American Democracy.

Professor Bednar, an expert in administrative law and the civil service, and Professor Nourse, a former appellate litigator at the Department of Justice and one of the nation’s foremost experts on Congress and its constitutional history, together provide historical and constitutional analysis demonstrating that Congress has long exercised its authority to insulate adjudicatory bodies from political interference.

The brief, which you can read in full here, argues:

  • The MSPB is a purely adjudicatory body. It functions like a court, hearing evidence, applying the law, and issuing binding decisions in disputes between federal employees and the government.

  • Congress has authority to protect adjudicatory independence. From the Founding era onward, Congress has created bodies insulated from political control to ensure fair and impartial decision-making.

  • At-will removal would violate due process. Allowing the President to remove MSPB members freely would compromise the neutrality of the tribunal and undermine the Fifth Amendment guarantee of a fair hearing.

  • Weakening MSPB independence risks system-wide consequences. Removing protections could destabilize the Board’s ability to function, leaving thousands of federal employees without a meaningful forum to challenge wrongful termination.

“The Constitution requires that when the government acts against its own employees, those individuals are entitled to a fair hearing before an impartial decisionmaker,” said Professor Nourse. “Allowing political control over that process would fundamentally undermine those protections.”


Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG) is a nonprofit organization that harnesses the power of 125,000 lawyers, law students, and advocates in the fight for justice. We identify where lawyers can make the greatest impact and mobilize them to defend democracy and the rule of law, protect civil and human rights, and advance environmental justice through coordinated legal action and advocacy efforts that create meaningful change for all Americans.