Asylum As We Know It Is Ending - Lawyers Are Needed More Than Ever

Tomorrow, the Biden administration will end Title 42, a Trump-era policy that effectively closed the southern border for the past three years. In clear violation of international and U.S. immigration law, Title 42 gave the U.S. Border Patrol the power to return vulnerable families to Mexico without so much as a chance to open an asylum claim. The policy also inflicted unimaginable suffering on hundreds of thousands of stranded families that were neglected, kidnapped, and tortured while waiting in Mexico. 

While the expiration of Title 42 is a welcome development and presents an opportunity to implement humane, equitable paths to asylum, the Biden administration is instead introducing new immigration policies that will severely limit access to asylum, separate families, and endanger the lives of thousands of individuals seeking safety in the U.S.

These new policies not only complicate the asylum-seeking process, which is an internationally recognized human right, but also significantly increases the risk of deportation and banishment for the most vulnerable people.

This policy shift means that the ONLY way asylum seekers will make it is with lawyers advising them, both before and after they present on the border. These changes are certain to result in thousands of asylum seekers being left to fend for themselves if they don’t have the support of lawyers like us.

Asylum seekers need us now more than ever. Please support Project Corazon as we provide critical services to help migrants understand their rights and ensure their safety amidst this treacherous legal landscape.

 
 
The Biden Administration’s new rule is cruel and in blatant disregard to our international obligations to accept those seeking refuge from persecution within our borders. Under the rule, L4GG’s clients, who are LGBTQ+ people, political activists, racial minorities, victims of torture, and other people fleeing violent persecution in their countries of origin, will no longer have a viable pathway to fair, orderly asylum processing. Instead, they will face the dilemma of risking deportation and banishment from the U.S., or remaining in countries which have poorly functioning or non-existent asylum systems, many of which pose the same dangers to our clients as their home countries. In fact, this rule increasingly endangers the thousands of vulnerable women, children, and families who are forced to live on the streets of border cities in Mexico, where cartel violence is currently escalating. We call on the administration to immediately withdraw the rule and instead pursue pathways to fair, orderly migration that restore full asylum.
— - Priscilla Orta, Supervising Attorney, Project Corazon
 
In his briefing on the end of Title 42 this morning, Sec. Mayorkas repeated it twice: “we are a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws.” And yet, with this rule, the administration is breaking domestic and international laws that require us to honor the immigrants upon whom this nation’s success depends. By penalizing those that are too poor, too disabled, too Black, too language-impaired, or too illiterate to use the extremely limited means of CBP One to schedule an appointment for consideration of an asylum claim at our Southern border, our President is hardening this nation’s stance beyond even what his predecessor imagined.

All that we at Lawyers for Good Government and other legal aid organizations have been asking for is the opening of lawful pathways to asylum, but what we have gotten are roadblocks. If the administration wants to fix immigration, they need to work with and listen to the people that have been filling the gaps Congress has left since this country decided to abrogate its responsibilities to both immigrants and the law.
— - Khadijah Silver, Supervising Attorney, Civil Rights

L4GG Statement on Biden Administration Doubling Down on Anti-Asylum Policies

Yesterday, the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department made a joint announcement on expanded legal pathways and refugee processing. However, this announcement was coupled with intentions to move forward with the proposed asylum transit ban, limited appointments through the CBP One app, inequitable access issues, and more anti-immigrant policies.  

“Punishing asylum seekers with deportation and banishment for pursuing safety through an internationally-recognized and protected pathway will surely lead to their harm and leave us in breach of our moral and legal obligations. While we welcome the announced expansion to refugee admissions and the creation of new pathways to protection for people from Central and South America, we are deeply concerned that the Biden Administration is doubling down on its limitations for seeking asylum, a human right that is recognized by both domestic and international law. Additionally, we find framing the refugee program as a tool to help manage border migration particularly harmful and politically wrought. As President Biden reminded us on World Refugee Day, ‘as Americans, protecting and welcoming refugees is part of who we are.’”

- Priscilla Orta, Supervising Attorney for Lawyers for Good Government’s Project Corazon

Earth Day Every Day - What Lawyers Can Do for Environmental Justice

Our planet is in crisis, and attorneys are uniquely situated to take bold action to address climate change. Lawyers can celebrate Earth Day every day by volunteering with and supporting L4GG’s Climate Change and Environmental Justice Program.

Lawyers are uniquely qualified to:

  1. Understand environmental laws and regulations & find legal solutions

    Lawyers are equipped to decode complex environmental laws. They can help overcome legal barriers by analyzing the policies that prevent states and local governments from implementing climate tools, such as virtual power purchase agreements and community programs, and coming up with legal solutions.

  2. Shape Federal, State, and Local policy
    Lawyers can help shape federal policy by commenting on federal agency regulations and programs, including how the federal government should spend the over $2T coming from federal agencies under Biden's Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act! Moreover, lawyers can provide legal guidance and help draft state and local climate and equity laws and policies as well.

  3. Communicate effectively
    Lawyers have strong oral and written communication skills, giving them the ability to work effectively with a wide range of stakeholders. They can use these skills to develop and deliver compelling arguments and presentations for community members, government officials, and others. Importantly, lawyers can also work with overburdened communities to make sure their voices are heard by state and local decision-makers implementing climate projects to ensure that community needs and environmental racism are addressed.

  4. Provide pro bono support
    Environmental justice issues directly affect marginalized communities. Lawyers can provide free legal support to frontline communities looking to implement climate projects and access historic federal funds.


Volunteers for L4GG’s Climate Change and Environmental Justice program do all of this and more! 


This Earth Day, we are excited to highlight 4 superstar volunteers who have plugged into our various initiatives! Read on to see how you can be using your legal skills to protect the environment this Earth Day and beyond.


Bo Mahr

Bo is a renewable energy development attorney who helps a wide variety of clean energy companies navigate project development from cradle to grave. From greenfield to decommissioning to tax equity, his practice has grown from utility-scale wind and solar to green hydrogen, DAC, battery storage, floating solar, and everything in between.

Bo has volunteered with L4GG for a few years now, working on various projects.

Determining whether municipalities can enter into virtual power purchase agreements (a first-of-its-kind issue), might be my favorite L4GG project that I’ve worked on. It’s a timely and critically important issue, and, having grown up in Missouri, it was great to play a part in advancing the already great work the city of St. Louis is doing in this area. These kinds of projects, with real and immediate impacts on great organizations, is what makes working with L4GG so special.  

 

Olivia Lin

Olivia is in the Investment Funds group at her firm, where she represents clients such as institutional investors and fund sponsors, and advises them on matters including fund formation, operation and regulatory compliance.

Olivia is currently involved with L4GG’s Benton Harbor Right to Water project. She assists with document review and data compilation regarding the state and local governments’ policy, internal communications, and actions taken in light of the various lead exceedances discovered in Benton Harbor’s drinking water. The data addresses local petitioners’ requests for more detailed background information on how government has responded to the crisis, including any internal incompetency or negligence.  Most recently, she assisted with drafting parts of a chronology report documenting the background and causes of the crisis.

I was drawn to the project because having watched the horrific Flint water crisis play out,  it was disturbing to see the cycle continue in Benton Harbor, another predominantly black and low-income community. For the past few years, residents of Benton Harbor were denied not only the fundamental right of having access to clean, affordable water, but also timely, transparent information and action from the state and local governments. With the crisis also being largely neglected on a national scale, the L4GG team is working to provide more transparent reporting for both Benton Harbor residents and the general public, which may ultimately influence government action and state/federal policy and enforcement. It is a pleasure to work with and learn from the L4GG team, who are passionate and knowledgeable about this grave issue, and who are working to bring to it more attention and transparency.

 

Mariya Naulo

Mariya is an attorney in Orrick’s Restructuring group. In addition to pro bono work, her practice includes the representation of creditors and debtors, the representation of parties buying and selling distressed assets, and bankruptcy-related investigations.

I volunteered to partner with L4GG on its 50-State Disadvantaged Communities Report soon after joining Orrick. This project was an exciting opportunity to support the efforts of disadvantaged communities to prepare for, withstand, and recover from severe environmental events. I have also enjoyed learning about how different states pursue environmental justice. L4GG staff are knowledgeable and passionate about their work. They are committed not only to the project at hand, but also to its underlying values.

 

Derek Green

Derek Green works at Davis Wright Tremaine. His practice includes a combination of energy regulatory and transactional matters.  He focuses on renewable energy development and advising clients on the changing legal landscape surrounding local energy policy and climate change.

Derek assisted with L4GG’s Federal Funding Webinar Series, which trained over 700 communities in how they can access over $2T in federal funding for climate equity and infrastructure projects.

Partnering with World Resources Institute and L4GG, I was part of a DWT team that helped to present on funding opportunities for meaningful decarbonization projects, with a focus on climate equity, through the US Department of Energy’s State Energy Program. L4GG is helping to provide practical advice and assistance to effectuate a clean energy transition. I appreciate the organization’s focus on climate resilience, clean energy and climate justice.

 

Want to leverage YOUR unique skills as a lawyer towards crucial climate equity initiatives? Learn more about how you can plug into the work we’re doing at L4GG:

L4GG Condemns Court Ruling to Pull Abortion Medication Off Market

Last Friday, federal judge Matthew Kascmaryk, of the Northern District of Texas, issued a ruling invalidating the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of mifepristone, one of two medications used in a standard medication abortion regimen. Mifepristone has been approved by the FDA for use in medication abortions since 2000, and its safety and efficacy records are exceptional.  

This decision is the latest in a slew of anti-abortion policies and rulings since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, and if allowed to take effect, it could be the most catastrophic ruling since Dobbs itself. Judge Kascmaryk’s decision would require manufacturers to cease distribution of the medication during the pendency of the litigation, further limiting access to abortion care for patients nationwide, including in those states where abortion is legal and protected. Mifepristone is used in over 50% of pregnancy terminations in the U.S., and without it, patients across the country will have trouble finding timely medical care. 

Judge Kascmaryk’s ruling is anti-choice and is a vicious attack against the right to bodily autonomy.

“In an attempt to further limit access to reproductive care, Judge Kascmaryk’s ruling ignores or distorts decades of credible data about the safety and efficacy of mifepristone for medication abortion. Regardless of the ultimate outcome of the litigation, it represents another political intrusion into a medical decision making process that should only take place between doctor and patient. ” 
— Alyssa Morrison, Reproductive Justice Staff Attorney at Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG)

The same day, a federal judge in Washington issued a competing ruling that would prohibit the FDA from discontinuing its use. It is unclear at this time what the impact of the competing rulings will be on access to this essential medication.


Reproductive Health Legal Assistance Project (RHLAP)

It is more crucial than ever for lawyers to fight for reproductive health and abortion access post-Dobbs. L4GG is continuing to provide reproductive healthcare providers with crucial legal guidance and updates on abortion laws in 56 states and territories through our Reproductive Health Legal Assistance Program (RHLAP). No matter what unjust policies are enacted in our country, we stand firm in our fight for reproductive justice.

If you are interested in volunteering for RHLAP, click here to learn more!

L4GG: Credible Fear Interviews in CBP Custody are Deplorable and Must Be Stopped

On Friday, the Biden Administration announced that it plans to increase the pace of migrant processing by expanding its use of Credible Fear Interviews (CFIs) on asylum seekers in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody.

In these interviews, border officers determine whether asylum seekers have a “credible fear” for their life to return to their home country that corresponds to a valid asylum claim. In practice, this process consists of cruel, ruthless interrogations on vulnerable migrants, including children, who have no access to counsel. 

Without passing the CFI, asylum seekers cannot proceed with their asylum claims, and border officials have the power to swiftly deport them back to Mexico or their home country. Rushed processing means more vulnerable asylum seekers will undergo further trauma, will not be guaranteed due process, and will be returned directly to the danger they are fleeing. 

Lawyers for Good Government strongly condemns this decision by the Department of Human Services and urges the Biden Administration to build in actual legal protections to ensure human rights. 

“I witnessed firsthand the last time Credible Fear Interviews were conducted inside of CBP facilities during the Trump Administration. While the Trump administration claimed to provide legal counsel to asylum seekers in their CFIs, in reality attorneys were often unable to provide more than 5 minutes of rushed preparation on a phone line without any privacy from CBP guards. We were not allowed inside the facilities, and migrants often sobbed and pleaded for more time to prepare for their interviews.

When the Biden administration starts taking their policies from the last President, we can only assume that they will also take their guidance on what access to counsel looks like, too. L4GG urges the administration to do better, and are prepared to fight back should they choose to inflict more harm on vulnerable people fleeing persecution in their home countries.”
— - Priscilla Orta, Supervising Attorney of Project Corazon at Lawyers for Good Government

L4GG Comments Against the Asylum Ban

On February 23rd, the Biden Administration proposed a new asylum ban that would drastically limit asylum access for the majority of migrants and lead to the return of asylum seekers to harm and possible death. The public only had 30 days to comment against the ban, which is the only way to fight it since it is an administrative rule. In the last month, Lawyers for Good Government has been hard at work, hosting a comment training webinar and office hours to help lawyers and advocates submit their public comments, and working with our coalition partners to fight this anti-immigrant policy.

In the past, we have seen advocates successfully fight harmful administrative rules, so we know these comments can, and hopefully will, make a difference. We urge President Biden to restore full asylum and fulfill his campaign promises to the world’s most vulnerable people.

Below are L4GG’s official comment, our joint comment with other non-profit organizations on the effect this ban would have on LGBTQ+ asylum seekers, and a comment written by students from the Yale Law School Immigrant Justice Project, who traveled to Brownsville, TX in partnership with Project Corazon to meet with immigration advocates and stakeholders in the Río Grande Valley and visit migrant camps and shelters in the cities of Matamoros and Reynosa in Mexico.

 

Final L4GG Comment Against the Asylum Ban:

 

Joint LGBTQ+ Comment Against the Asylum Ban:

 

Yale Law School Immigrant Justice Project’s Comment Against the Asylum Ban:

100+ Law Firms and Companies Donated $20m+ in Pro Bono Legal Services to L4GG in 2022

Lawyers for Good Government mobilized more than 1600 legal volunteers from more than 100 law firms and corporate legal departments last year.

Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG) is proud to announce the results of its 2022 pro bono audit detailing donated legal services from law firms, corporate legal departments, and other volunteers to support its various programs. 

More than 100 law firms and corporate legal departments donated more than 23,700 hours of pro bono legal services to support L4GG’s civil and human rights initiatives in 2022, including Lawyers for Racial Justice, Climate Change and Environmental Justice Program, Project Corazon, Reproductive Health Legal Assistance Project, and more. Collectively, these Pro Bono Partners donated more than $20 million in pro bono legal services to efforts spearheaded by L4GG last year. 

Together, ​​volunteers from top AmLaw ranked firms and Fortune 500 companies helped accomplish the following with L4GG in 2022: 

  • Mobilizing 511 volunteers from more than 50 law firms and corporate legal departments to provide clear, up-to-date legal guidance to healthcare providers in 56 states and territories across the country;

  • Securing entry into the U.S. for 1347 asylum seekers, defending their human rights at the southern border;

  • Providing temporary security for over 200 Ukrainian nationals and their families living in the U.S. in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine war; and

  • Training more than 700 communities from more than 25 states on how to secure federal climate funding in support of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing climate resiliency.

Of special note, the following law firms donated sponsorships or pro bono legal services in excess of $250,000 to L4GG in 2022: 

  • Kirkland & Ellis

  • Goodwin 

  • Orrick 

  • Wilson Sonsini 

  • White & Case

  • Linklaters

  • Mayer Brown 

  • Nelson Mullins 

  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

  • Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 

  • Dechert LLP 

  • Proskauer Rose 

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel 

  • Sidley Austin 

“Kirkland & Ellis is proud to partner with Lawyers for Good Government on many of their important social justice initiatives. We are grateful for the opportunity for our firm to efficiently and effectively direct our resources and our lawyers’ skills to some of the most vulnerable populations among us,” said Jacqueline Haberfeld, Global Director and Pro Bono Counsel for Kirkland & Ellis.

“We are privileged to partner with L4GG on projects that positively impact climate change, help transform the lives of immigrants, and otherwise have broad social impact,” said Rene Kathawala, Pro Bono Counsel, Orrick. “The relationship with L4GG is enhanced by the skilled and dedicated lawyers that we work with at L4GG who provide such tremendous support to us.”

“We are thankful for L4GG’s dynamic partnership in recent years on so many initiatives to serve those in need. L4GG is consistently responsive, enthusiastic, and so knowledgeable in assisting us—they are a joy to work with,” said Luke Liss, Pro Bono Partner, Wilson Sonsini.

“We are proud to partner with L4GG in addressing the most important issues impacting our communities. Their ability to quickly mobilize law firms on large scale projects with a high level of skill and organization amplifies our efforts to secure human rights and equal justice for all,” said Andrew Compton, Partner, Linklaters.

“L4GG represents the very best of what our pro bono community can accomplish as a collective. Nelson Mullins is a proud supporter of this very special partner that stands out on the national stage in its ability to respond to of-the-moment community challenges and offer finely-tuned expertise, training modules and user platforms which have effectively mobilized the legal community on a national scale,” said Elisa Kodish, Pro Bono Partner, Nelson Mullins

“This past year, I signed a petition committing to take action to protect women’s rights,” said Brit Dufilho, partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth. “Plenty of groups made it easy to give money, but L4GG offered an organized avenue to use my skills as a lawyer to provide meaningful help. They put us face to face with stakeholders who told us why they needed our research and how it would make a difference. I’m grateful to be part of the significant work L4GG is doing to coordinate lawyers who are interested in making a difference.”

“We are so grateful that as one new humanitarian crisis quickly follows another, Lawyers for Good Government timely provides our attorneys with responsive opportunities and supports them in their work,” said Jonathan Baum, Director of Pro Bono Services, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.

“The projects we have with L4GG enable our lawyers to look beyond the individual case in order to make a difference on a larger scale. This is not only beneficial but essential given the key role the private sector plays in securing equal access to justice,” said Bill Silverman, Partner, Proskauer.

“Kramer Levin is proud to partner with Lawyers for Good Government to support its critical work to fight for human rights,” said Aaron Frankel, Partner and Co-Chair of Pro Bono Committee, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel.

“Sidley is so grateful to be able to partner with Lawyers For Good Government and work together to secure the rights of women, immigrants, small businesses, and others, to ensure equal justice under the law,” said Sara L. Mandelbaum, Pro Bono Counsel, Sidley Austin.

URGENT: Tell President Biden NO to Family Detention

URGENT CALL TO ACTION:

ASK YOUR REPS TO JOIN L4GG
IN TELLING PRESIDENT BIDEN
NO MORE FAMILY DETENTION


Please take 5 minutes today to contact your representatives and senators to sign these two crucial letters to help us stop family detention:

  1. Please call or email by COB today and ask your representative to co-sign this e-Dear Colleague letter being sent by over 30 of our Congress members to President Biden, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, joining our call asking for President Biden to fulfill his promise to end family detention and expand legal pathways to immigration. 

  2. Please call or email today to ask your senator to co-sign this letter being led by Sen. Durbin addressed to the President opposing family detention. The letter closes tomorrow, March 23 at noon, so we'd appreciate your support in getting as many Dem Senate signatures as possible.

    Lawyers for Good Government and many of our partner organizations have endorsed these letters and stand behind them with all our hearts. We desperately need more signers to get the point across that family detention is unacceptable.

    Here are some more resources:

Once you've shared the letters, let us know and ask your friends to join us in making calls! Tag us across social media platforms and hashtag it with #nosafedetention, pointing out the American Association of Pediatrics' finding that there is no "safe" amount of detention for children.

For more on why this topic is so urgent, read the following blog post by Alyssa Morrison, L4GG’s Reproductive Justice Staff Attorney, about her experience volunteering at Karnes Correctional Center.


Earlier this week, it was announced that the Biden Administration is considering reinstating family detention as a means of managing the increase in migration that is anticipated to follow the lifting of Title 42 COVID-19 restrictions at the border in May 2023. Following the disastrous implementation of the CBP One App and the proposed implementation of the asylum transit ban, this threat to return to the days of family detention is another nail in the coffin of the Administration’s promises to uphold the dignity of migrants and restore the integrity of our asylum system. For those who look to the Administration to fulfill these promises, this news is stunningly disappointing, but perhaps no longer surprising. 

I come to L4GG as a reproductive justice policy attorney; I am not an immigration practitioner. But, I have seen firsthand the lack of humanity involved in the family detention system. Texas has several ICE detention centers. Among them is the Karnes Family Immigration Detention Center, located in a small Texas town about an hour southeast of San Antonio. As a law student participating in my school’s clinic program, I spent time working with asylum seekers at Karnes in 2017. Like other ICE detention centers, Karnes is run by the GEO Group–the private company behind much of the U.S. prison industrial complex. Any suggestion that these centers are not run like prisons, and their residents are not viewed with the same level of disregard that the U.S. famously affords the incarcerated, is controverted by this affiliation. And, the view from inside the center does little to discourage the comparison. Although, there is one noticeable difference in the residential composition: the addition of children. 

During my time at Karnes, I worked with my fellow students to help the detained women prepare for their credible fear interviews–the process by which they would begin their fight for asylum protection. In order to ‘pass’ these interviews, the asylum seeker must convince the officer that they have a fear of return that is not only credible, but is rooted in one of the protected asylum categories. In other words, even if the threat to their safety if they return home is absolute, they must fit that story into an unfamiliar legal framework, often through the use of an unfamiliar translator, in order to have a hope of obtaining relief. Their status as detainees meant that many of the women entered these interviews uncertain, weary, and stripped of any remaining sense of agency over their circumstances. It also meant that their ability to access legal assistance to navigate the process was often at the mercy of the detention center itself. 

In preparation for these CFIs, the women told us their stories. In rooms the size of a utility closet, they laid bare the details of the most delicate and excruciatingly personal moments of their lives to a complete stranger. For the mothers in the group, they were faced with the choice to have their child in the room with them, listening to the traumatic and often violent details of why they were forced to flee their homes, or to leave the child outside of the room, separated from them. On more than one occasion, their child made the choice for them, refusing to leave their mother’s side and relinquish that remaining piece of stability and safety. So, the women spoke and the children heard. And then, they were led back to their rooms by the officers–locked out of sight. 

The discretion of those detention officers was evident each day that we showed up to work at the center. Upon arrival one morning, we were admonished for having left a tissue box in one of those closet-sized rooms rather than placing it back where we found it. For the infraction of bringing tissues to a crying detainee, we were threatened with not being permitted to return to the facility to provide legal services. There was a play mat on the floor outside of the meeting rooms, for the children. And the authority of the detention officers was on full display when it was used to sharply chastise a child for rolling a toy truck off of the play mat and onto the floor. These patterns of control repeated in big and small ways throughout our time at Karnes, as we heard stories of medical care being denied to both women and children, children being treated like prisoners, and access to attorneys being arbitrarily limited.

The system of detention that we witnessed at Karnes cannot be our answer to a call for equitable, safe and effective asylum. 

A group of L4GG volunteers at Karnes Correctional Center.

The cruelty of detention is obvious and unacceptable. As we look to the Biden Administration to end the use of Title 42 at the border and shape effective and humane processes for asylum seekers, we must demand that the most vulnerable are not treated as disposable, that mercy and compassion are not suffocated by administrative convenience and that the people who come to our borders seeking aid are met with the promise of freedom, not imprisonment. We call on our community to hold this Administration accountable and to remind those in power that “good government” is achievable only when we use it to protect the individuals and communities who need it most.
— Alyssa Morrison, L4GG Reproductive Justice Staff Attorney

The Making of a Front Page Story

On Sunday, March 12, the Washington Post ran a front page story about the physical hardships and digital hurdles facing asylum seekers in northern Mexico as they attempt to access our asylum system. The piece tells the story of a number of our clients in Reynosa and Matamoros, including victims of torture, families with young children, and others who are forced to rely on a glitchy smartphone app called CBP One to schedule their initial appointments with CBP at ports of entry. Because the app is so unreliable, they are stuck in dangerous, squalid conditions in border cities in Mexico, risking their life every day they are unable to secure an appointment. 

A front-page story about Project Corazon’s clients and their difficulties access the asylum system.

 

If you haven’t yet read the story, please do - it’s an incredibly important piece about a human rights crisis that deserves your attention. In this post, however, we thought we’d provide a behind the scenes look into the work that led to the Washington Post story. 

 

BACKGROUND

In January 2023, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began requiring asylum seekers to apply for an appointment via the CBP One app before they reach a port of entry. In doing so, the agency stopped allowing pro bono attorneys, like Project Corazon staff and volunteers, to advocate directly on migrants’ behalf for humanitarian exemptions to the process. Now, asylum seekers are left to fend for themselves navigating an app whose terms and conditions and error messages are only in English, and which runs out of appointments in minutes.

At L4GG, we were seeing firsthand what impact this change had on our clients: they were stuck in ever worsening conditions in refugee camps in border cities in Mexico, trying desperately to find sufficient technology and wifi to access an appointment via a smartphone app. We met an asylum seeker who was severely injured while trying to find a wifi signal and others could only secure one appointment for their family, so were forced to choose between seeking asylum or separating their family. 

The situation was already bleak, and yet last month the Biden Administration proposed a new asylum rule that could make things even worse. The new proposed rule, which if allowed goes into effect in May 2023, proposes that asylum seekers figure out how to use this app, or face a presumption that they are ineligible for asylum. We knew that to have a chance at making a change, we had to get the story into the mainstream, so people across the country would better understand the real-world implications of what is being proposed.

 

Initial Conversations

L4GG sent a communication to a number of immigration reporters about the Biden Administration’s newly proposed asylum rule as well as difficulties our clients were having with the CBP One app. Washington Post’s Arelis Hernández replied and asked if we had any specific client stories we’d be willing to share, as an exclusive, with the Washington Post. 

We spent a number of days talking to our clients in Matamoros and Reynosa, vetting who would be a good candidate to talk to the media and finding out who was willing to share his or her individual story. Our clients are our heroes, so it’s no surprise that a number of them wanted to help advocate against these policies and get the word out. A handful of them said yes, and we let Arelis and her team know.

 

Coordinating a Border Trip

The Washington Post generously offered to put their weight behind this reporting by sending Arelis to Mexico as well as a photographer and videographer. To cross the border into these border cities is no easy feat. In Matamoros, a group of 4 U.S. citizens were recently kidnapped, and two of them were killed. In Reynosa, the cartels regularly wage violence.

We worked to make sure the Washington Post team had sufficient security crossing into the border and acted as their guides on the ground. At L4GG, we have worked in these spaces for years and have a number of partners on the ground, such as the Sidewalk School and a number of refugee shelters, who make it possible for our staff and volunteers to cross to meet with clients. We couldn’t have done this without them and their work is, rightfully, featured in the story as well. 

We introduced them to partner organizations and asylum seekers from all walks of life, who graciously shared their stories. The Post captured photos of the conditions our clients are living in, which are dutifully documented in the final story. They also produced a short video overview of the issue. 

After extensive fact-checking, the story was published this past Saturday, March 11, 2023 online and on Sunday, March 12, 2023 in print version of the Washington Post. 

We’re thrilled with the final product and are so grateful to Arelis Hernández for her tireless reporting and to the Washington Post for publishing such an impactful piece. We hope you’ll take the time to read it and share it with your friends and family.

 

How You Can Help

We hope you’ll make your voice heard on this issue and consider submitting a comment against the proposed asylum rule that would make conditions on the border even more hopeless. We put together a webinar on the topic and resources on how to submit a comment here

Last, but not least, we hope you’ll consider supporting our ability to continue doing this impactful work on behalf of asylum seekers and other communities facing insurmountable hurdles, by donating to L4GG here.

 

L4GG Joins Coalition of 22 Environmental Organizations Opposing Federal Highway Infrastructure Guidance

L4GG Joins Coalition of 22 Environmental Organizations Opposing Federal Highway Infrastructure Guidance

Lawyers for Good Government (L4GG) joined NRDC, Evergreen Action, and a broad group of 22 transportation, equity and environmental organizations to send a sharply worded letter to Federal Highway Administrator Shailen Bhatt on March 16, 2023 opposing the agency’s new guidance from February 2023 regarding state transportation spending.